Opteron 152 vs Athlon 64 FX-51
Opteron 152
Athlon 64 FX-51
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 152 is positioned at rank 700 and the Athlon 64 FX-51 is on rank 1133, so the Opteron 152 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 152
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-51
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 FX-51 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($733) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 FX-51 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($733) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 152 and Athlon 64 FX-51
Opteron 152
The Opteron 152 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $800.
Athlon 64 FX-51
The Athlon 64 FX-51 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 152 and Athlon 64 FX-51 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Opteron 152 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-51 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 152. The Opteron 152 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-51 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 152 scores 620 against the Athlon 64 FX-51's 615 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 152. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 FX-51 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+18% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 90 nm-31% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Venus (2004−2005) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 620 | 615 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 152 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-51 uses 940 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 152 | Athlon 64 FX-51 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 152 and Athlon 64 FX-51
