Opteron 152
VS
Core i5-12400F

Opteron 152 vs Core i5-12400F

AMD

Opteron 152

1 Cores1 Thrd104 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 152 is positioned at rank #700 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 152

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13408%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2532%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2249%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1738%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
99%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
98%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
97%
#700
Opteron 152
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-12400F (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 152Core i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 152 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 152Core i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 152 and Core i5-12400F

AMD

Opteron 152

The Opteron 152 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Opteron 152 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Opteron 152 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Opteron 152 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 152 scores 620 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 187.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Opteron 152 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureOpteron 152Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
6 / 12+500%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
4.4 GHz+69%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+4%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process
90 nm
Intel 7 nm-92%
Architecture
Venus (2004−2005)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
620
19,532+3050%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 152 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 152Core i5-12400F
Socket
939
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 152) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureOpteron 152Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value