Opteron 248
VS
Athlon Neo X2 L325

Opteron 248 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

AMD

Opteron 248

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 248 is positioned at rank 726 and the Athlon Neo X2 L325 is on rank 1185, so the Opteron 248 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 248

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14205%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2682%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2383%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1841%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
98%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#726
Opteron 248
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#730
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#738
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L325

#1173
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4771%
#1174
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4701%
#1175
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4315%
#1176
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4296%
#1177
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4257%
#1179
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4111%
#1180
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3941%
#1181
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3935%
#1182
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3829%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
98%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
98%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
95%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
92%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
92%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
91%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
89%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
87%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 (2009) utilizes 65 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 248Athlon Neo X2 L325
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 248 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 248Athlon Neo X2 L325
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 248 and Athlon Neo X2 L325

AMD

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Opteron 248 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 248 versus 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 248. The Opteron 248 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 248 scores 585 against the Athlon Neo X2 L325's 615 — a 5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L325.

FeatureOpteron 248Athlon Neo X2 L325
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+47%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Congo (2009)
PassMark
585
615+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 248 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 248Athlon Neo X2 L325
Socket
940
ASB1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0