Opteron 3280 vs Atom C3708
Opteron 3280
Atom C3708
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3280 is positioned at rank 93 and the Atom C3708 is on rank 615, so the Opteron 3280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3280
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3708
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 3280 | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 3280 | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3280 and Atom C3708
Opteron 3280
The Opteron 3280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,783 points. Launch price was $229.
Atom C3708
The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 3280 and Atom C3708 share an identical 8-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 3280 versus 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 — a 69.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 3280 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Opteron 3280 uses the Zurich (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom C3708 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3280 scores 3,783 against the Atom C3708's 3,750 — a 0.9% lead for the Opteron 3280. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3280 vs 16 MB on the Atom C3708.
| Feature | Opteron 3280 | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+106% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+47% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 16 MB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Zurich (2012) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 3,783 | 3,750 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 3280 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3708 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 3280 | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Opteron 3280 and Atom C3708
