Opteron 4334 vs Xeon E3-1220

Opteron 4334 vs Xeon E3-1220 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 4334

6 / 6

3,949

+2.3%

Athlon II X4 630

Athlon X4 970

Athlon X4 830

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen 5 7640HS

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E3-1220

4 / 4

3,859

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 4334 vs Xeon E3-1220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 4334 vs Xeon E3-1220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 4334

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $204 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Xeon E3-1220

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,859 vs 3,949).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 4334 better than Xeon E3-1220?

Yes. Opteron 4334 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 4334 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 4334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 4334 is the better buy right now. Opteron 4334 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $204 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 4334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 4334 vs Xeon E3-1220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 4334

The Opteron 4334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,949 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E3-1220

The Xeon E3-1220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,859 points. Launch price was $395.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 4334 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 4334 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 4334 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 4334 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Opteron 4334 uses the Seoul (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 4334 scores 3,949 against the Xeon E3-1220's 3,859 — a 2.3% lead for the Opteron 4334. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4334 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220.

Feature	Opteron 4334	Xeon E3-1220
Cores / Threads	6 / 6+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6144 kB+2300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Seoul (2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,949+2%	3,859

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 4334 uses the C32 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.