Celeron N5105 vs Opteron 4334

Celeron N5105 vs Opteron 4334 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N5105

4 / 4

4,003

+1.4%

3,949

0.0%

Athlon II X4 630

Athlon X4 970

Athlon X4 830

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen 5 7640HS

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5105 vs Opteron 4334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5105 vs Opteron 4334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5105

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 95W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4334, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.

Opteron 4334

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,949 vs 4,003).
❌Launch MSRP is still $204 MSRP, while Celeron N5105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌850% higher power demand at 95W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5105 better than Opteron 4334?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4334 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N5105 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5105 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 4334 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron N5105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $204 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 4334 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 4334 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5105 vs Opteron 4334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 4334

The Opteron 4334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,949 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4334 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 4334 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 4334 — a 18.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 4334 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron N5105 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 4334 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Opteron 4334's 3,949 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4334.

Feature	Celeron N5105	Opteron 4334
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.1 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	6144 kB+300%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Seoul (2012)
PassMark	4,003+1%	3,949

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5105 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 4334 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.