Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2

AMD

Opteron 4386

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2407 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 4386

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (42 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($459 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $209 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 83.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4386 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (3,272 vs 3,273).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 4386 better than Xeon E5-2407 v2?
Yes. Opteron 4386 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 4386 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 4386 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 4386 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2407 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Opteron 4386 comes in 83.6% more expensive on MSRP at $459 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2407 v2 is also 83.5% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2407 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Opteron 4386

The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2407 v2

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013βˆ’2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.

⚑

Processing Power

The Opteron 4386 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Opteron 4386 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 β€” a 45.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 4386 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Opteron 4386 uses the Seoul (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013βˆ’2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 4386 scores 3,273 against the Xeon E5-2407 v2's 3,272 β€” a 0% lead for the Opteron 4386. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2.

FeatureOpteron 4386Xeon E5-2407 v2
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+58%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+29%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Seoul (2012)
Ivy Bridge-EN (2013βˆ’2014)
PassMark
3,273
3,272
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 4386 uses the C32 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 4386Xeon E5-2407 v2
Socket
C32
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
Yes
β€”
PCIe Lanes
42
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Opteron 4386) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407 v2). Primary use case: Opteron 4386 targets Server.

FeatureOpteron 4386Xeon E5-2407 v2
Integrated GPU
No
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
AMD-V
β€”
Target Use
Server
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 4386 was priced at $459, while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($459 vs $250), Xeon E5-2407 v2 was $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 4386 delivers 7.1 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2407 v2 β€” making the Xeon E5-2407 v2 the 58.9% better value option.

FeatureOpteron 4386Xeon E5-2407 v2
MSRP
$459
$250-46%
Performance per Dollar
7.1
13.1+85%
Release Date
2012
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.