
Opteron 4386

Xeon E5-2407 v2
Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron 4386
2012Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (42 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($459 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Xeon E5-2407 v2
2013Why buy it
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Costs $209 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
- β Delivers 83.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
- β Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4386 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,272 vs 3,273).
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 4386 better than Xeon E5-2407 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 4386 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 4386
The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2407 v2
The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.
Processing Power
The Opteron 4386 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Opteron 4386 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 β a 45.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 4386 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Opteron 4386 uses the Seoul (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013β2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 4386 scores 3,273 against the Xeon E5-2407 v2's 3,272 β a 0% lead for the Opteron 4386. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2.
| Feature | Opteron 4386 | Xeon E5-2407 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+3100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Seoul (2012) | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013β2014) |
| PassMark | 3,273 | 3,272 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 4386 uses the C32 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 4386 | Xeon E5-2407 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | C32 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 42 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Opteron 4386) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407 v2). Primary use case: Opteron 4386 targets Server.
| Feature | Opteron 4386 | Xeon E5-2407 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Server | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Opteron 4386 was priced at $459, while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($459 vs $250), Xeon E5-2407 v2 was $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 4386 delivers 7.1 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2407 v2 β making the Xeon E5-2407 v2 the 58.9% better value option.
| Feature | Opteron 4386 | Xeon E5-2407 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $459 | $250-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1 | 13.1+85% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















