Celeron N5100 vs Opteron 4386

Celeron N5100 vs Opteron 4386 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N5100

4 / 4

3,305

+1.0%

3,273

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5100 vs Opteron 4386 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5100 vs Opteron 4386: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4386 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4386, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 42 PCIe lanes.

Opteron 4386

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 42 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (42 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,273 vs 3,305).
❌Launch MSRP is still $459 MSRP, while Celeron N5100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5100 better than Opteron 4386?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4386 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N5100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5100 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 4386 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron N5100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $459 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 4386 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.2% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 4386 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5100 vs Opteron 4386 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 4386

The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4386 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4386 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 4386 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 4386 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the Opteron 4386's 3,273 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N5100. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5100 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386.

Feature	Celeron N5100	Opteron 4386
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.8 GHz+36%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.1 GHz+182%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	8192 kB+433%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Seoul (2012)
PassMark	3,305	3,273

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 4386 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N5100	Opteron 4386
Socket	BGA1338	C32
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	42