Opteron 4386 vs Xeon W3570

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon W3570 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 4386

8 / 8

3,273

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon W3570

4 / 8

3,267

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon W3570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon W3570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 4386

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($459 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 118.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($459 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (42 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W3570

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,267 vs 3,273).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 4386 better than Xeon W3570?

Yes. Opteron 4386 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 4386 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 4386 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 4386 is the better buy right now. Opteron 4386 comes in $540 cheaper on MSRP at $459 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 118.0% better value on MSRP (7.1 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 4386 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 4386 vs Xeon W3570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 4386

The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W3570

The Xeon W3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $480.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 4386 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3570 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4386 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3570 — a 9.4% clock advantage for the Opteron 4386 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Opteron 4386 uses the Seoul (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3570 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 4386 scores 3,273 against the Xeon W3570's 3,267 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 4386. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3570.

Feature	Opteron 4386	Xeon W3570
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+10%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Seoul (2012)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,273	3,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 4386 uses the C32 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 4386	Xeon W3570
Socket	C32	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	42	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Opteron 4386) / not specified (Xeon W3570). Primary use case: Opteron 4386 targets Server.

Feature	Opteron 4386	Xeon W3570
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 4386 was priced at $459, while the Xeon W3570 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($459 vs $999), Opteron 4386 was $540 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 4386 delivers 7.1 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W3570 — making the Opteron 4386 the 74.2% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 4386	Xeon W3570
MSRP	$459-54%	$999
Performance per Dollar	7.1+115%	3.3
Release Date	2012	2009

Search Opteron 4386 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.