Opteron 6378
VS
Core i7-8565U

Opteron 6378 vs Core i7-8565U

AMD

Opteron 6378

16 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-8565U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 6378 is positioned at rank 57 and the Core i7-8565U is on rank 988, so the Opteron 6378 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6378

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1412%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
267%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
237%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
183%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
99%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
85%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
82%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
82%
#57
Opteron 6378
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#60
Opteron 6274
MSRP: $639|Avg: $80
96%
#61
Opteron 6238
MSRP: $455|Avg: $118
96%
#63
Opteron 6376
MSRP: $703|Avg: N/A
95%
#64
Opteron 6328
MSRP: $575|Avg: $42
90%
#65
Opteron 6272
MSRP: $523|Avg: $50
89%
#71
Opteron 6220
MSRP: $523|Avg: $239
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-8565U

#976
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2008%
#977
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1979%
#978
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1817%
#979
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1808%
#980
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1792%
#982
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1730%
#983
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1659%
#984
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1656%
#985
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1612%
#988
Core i7-8565U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
99%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
98%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
98%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
96%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
96%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
96%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-8565U (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 6378Core i7-8565U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Abu Dhabi (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 6378 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 6378Core i7-8565U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6378 and Core i7-8565U

AMD

Opteron 6378

The Opteron 6378 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,889 points. Launch price was $396.

Intel

Core i7-8565U

The Core i7-8565U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,976 points. Launch price was $409.

Processing Power

The Opteron 6378 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-8565U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6378 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6378 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-8565U — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-8565U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Opteron 6378 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-8565U uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6378 scores 5,889 against the Core i7-8565U's 5,976 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-8565U. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 6378Core i7-8565U
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+300%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.6 GHz+39%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+33%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB+6300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Abu Dhabi (2012)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
5,889
5,976+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6378 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-8565U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 6378Core i7-8565U
Socket
G34
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%