Opteron 6378 vs Xeon Gold 6348H

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon Gold 6348H Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6378

16 / 16

5,889

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Gold 6348H

24 / 48

5,967

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon Gold 6348H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon Gold 6348H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6378

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 165W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6348H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,889 vs 5,967).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 33 MB).

Xeon Gold 6348H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+312.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌43.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6348H better than Opteron 6378?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6348H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6348H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6348H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 312.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6348H still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6348H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6348H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012), 312.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon Gold 6348H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6378

The Opteron 6378 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,889 points. Launch price was $396.

Xeon Gold 6348H

The Xeon Gold 6348H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 5,967 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6378 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348H offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6378 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348H — a 24% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6348H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Opteron 6378 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6378 scores 5,889 against the Xeon Gold 6348H's 5,967 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6348H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6378 vs 33 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348H.

Feature	Opteron 6378	Xeon Gold 6348H
Cores / Threads	16 / 16	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.2 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	33 MB (total)+313%
L2 Cache	16 MB+1500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	5,889	5,967+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6378 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.