Opteron 6378 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6378

16 / 16

5,889

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1515M v5

4 / 8

5,925

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6378

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,889 vs 5,925).
❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1515M v5 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1515M v5

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P580, while Opteron 6378 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1515M v5 better than Opteron 6378?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6378 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1515M v5 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1515M v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1515M v5 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1515M v5 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1515M v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6378 vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6378

The Opteron 6378 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,889 points. Launch price was $396.

Xeon E3-1515M v5

The Xeon E3-1515M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,925 points. Launch price was $489.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6378 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6378 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6378 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1515M v5 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1515M v5 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Opteron 6378 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6378 scores 5,889 against the Xeon E3-1515M v5's 5,925 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1515M v5. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 6378	Xeon E3-1515M v5
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+300%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB+6300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Skylake-H (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,889	5,925
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,017

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6378 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6378	Xeon E3-1515M v5
Socket	G34	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6378) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E3-1515M v5). The Xeon E3-1515M v5 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P580), while the Opteron 6378 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1515M v5 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1515M v5 rivals Core i7-6700HQ.