Opteron X3216
VS
Athlon II Neo K125

Opteron X3216 vs Athlon II Neo K125

AMD

Opteron X3216

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Athlon II Neo K125

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron X3216 is positioned at rank 395 and the Athlon II Neo K125 is on rank 982, so the Opteron X3216 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3216

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5549%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1048%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
931%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
719%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
99%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
99%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
98%
#395
Opteron X3216
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
99%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K125

#970
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1968%
#971
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1939%
#972
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1780%
#973
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1772%
#974
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1756%
#976
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1696%
#977
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1626%
#978
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1623%
#979
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1579%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
97%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
97%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
96%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
96%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
94%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3216 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron X3216Athlon II Neo K125
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II Neo K125 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron X3216Athlon II Neo K125
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron X3216 and Athlon II Neo K125

AMD

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Athlon II Neo K125

The Athlon II Neo K125 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,491 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Opteron X3216 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II Neo K125 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Opteron X3216 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 versus 1.7 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K125 — a 55.3% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216. The Opteron X3216 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K125 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3216 scores 1,498 against the Athlon II Neo K125's 1,491 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron X3216.

FeatureOpteron X3216Athlon II Neo K125
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3 GHz+76%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Excavator (2017−2018)
Geneva (2010)
PassMark
1,498
1,491
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron X3216 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II Neo K125 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron X3216Athlon II Neo K125
Socket
FP4
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0