Opteron X3216
VS
Core 2 Duo SU7300

Opteron X3216 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

AMD

Opteron X3216

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron X3216 is positioned at rank 395 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300 is on rank 43, so the Core 2 Duo SU7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3216

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5549%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1048%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
931%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
719%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
99%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
99%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
98%
#395
Opteron X3216
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
99%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SU7300

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#31
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
196%
#32
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
193%
#33
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
177%
#34
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
177%
#35
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
175%
#37
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
169%
#38
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
162%
#39
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
162%
#40
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
157%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3216 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron X3216Core 2 Duo SU7300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron X3216Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($289)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron X3216 and Core 2 Duo SU7300

AMD

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron X3216 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — a 79.1% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Opteron X3216 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3216 scores 1,498 against the Core 2 Duo SU7300's 1,496 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron X3216.

FeatureOpteron X3216Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+131%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz+23%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
3 MB+200%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Excavator (2017−2018)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,498
1,496
Geekbench 6 Single
188
Geekbench 6 Multi
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron X3216 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron X3216Core 2 Duo SU7300
Socket
FP4
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron X3216) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop.

FeatureOpteron X3216Core 2 Duo SU7300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop