Opteron X3216
VS
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Opteron X3216 vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+

AMD

Opteron X3216

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron X3216 is positioned at rank 395 and the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is on rank 1082, so the Opteron X3216 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3216

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5549%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1048%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
931%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
719%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
99%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
99%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
98%
#395
Opteron X3216
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Xeon D-1537
MSRP: $470|Avg: $350
99%
#401
Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP: $372|Avg: $299
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
87071%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
82274%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
59737%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
17996%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
14255%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
12470%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7142%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7049%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6418%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6418%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6346%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6175%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6089%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6064%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6009%
#1081
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
100%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
100%
#1083
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
99%
#1084
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
97%
#1085
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
96%
#1086
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
93%
#1087
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
92%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
92%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
92%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
91%
#1091
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
91%
#1092
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
90%
#1093
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
86%
#1094
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
84%
#1095
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
79%
#1096
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3216 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron X3216Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron X3216Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron X3216 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+

AMD

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,505 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron X3216 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216. The Opteron X3216 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3216 scores 1,498 against the Athlon 64 X2 5200+'s 1,505 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5200+.

FeatureOpteron X3216Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+11%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+100%
512K
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Excavator (2017−2018)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,498
1,505
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron X3216 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron X3216Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Socket
FP4
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0