
Opteron X3418

Core i5-4310M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron X3418 is positioned at rank 115 and the Core i5-4310M is on rank 217, so the Opteron X3418 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3418
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4310M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron X3418 | Core i5-4310M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron X3418 | Core i5-4310M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron X3418 and Core i5-4310M

Opteron X3418
The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

Core i5-4310M
The Core i5-4310M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,067 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Opteron X3418 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4310M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X3418 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4310M — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4310M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Opteron X3418 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4310M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3418 scores 3,043 against the Core i5-4310M's 3,067 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4310M.
| Feature | Opteron X3418 | Core i5-4310M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Excavator (2017−2018) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,043 | 3,067 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron X3418 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4310M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron X3418 | Core i5-4310M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















