
Opteron X3418

Xeon W3530
Opteron X3418 vs Xeon W3530 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Opteron X3418 vs Xeon W3530 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Opteron X3418 vs Xeon W3530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Opteron X3418
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3530 across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,043 vs 3,059).
Xeon W3530
2010Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Opteron X3418 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W3530 better than Opteron X3418?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron X3418 vs Xeon W3530 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron X3418
The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017β2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W3530
The Xeon W3530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,059 points. Launch price was $999.
Processing Power
The Opteron X3418 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3530's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 versus 3.06 GHz on the Xeon W3530 β a 4.5% clock advantage for the Opteron X3418 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Opteron X3418 uses the Excavator (2017β2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W3530 uses Bloomfield (2008β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3418 scores 3,043 against the Xeon W3530's 3,059 β a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W3530.
| Feature | Opteron X3418 | Xeon W3530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+5% | 3.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | β | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Excavator (2017β2018) | Bloomfield (2008β2010) |
| PassMark | 3,043 | 3,059 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron X3418 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3530 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron X3418 | Xeon W3530 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















