Opteron X3418 vs Xeon L5630

Opteron X3418 vs Xeon L5630 Performance Spectrum

Opteron X3418

4 / 4

3,043

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5630

4 / 8

3,048

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron X3418 vs Xeon L5630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron X3418 vs Xeon L5630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron X3418

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 40W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L5630 across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,043 vs 3,048).

Xeon L5630

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 40W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5630 better than Opteron X3418?

Yes. Xeon L5630 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L5630 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 14 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L5630 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon L5630 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3418 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron X3418 vs Xeon L5630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron X3418

The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon L5630

The Xeon L5630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $1,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron X3418 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon L5630's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon L5630 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Opteron X3418 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Opteron X3418 uses the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon L5630 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron X3418 scores 3,043 against the Xeon L5630's 3,048 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon L5630.

Feature	Opteron X3418	Xeon L5630
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.13 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Excavator (2017−2018)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,043	3,048

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron X3418 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5630 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.