Pentium 3560M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Pentium 3560M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Pentium 3560M

2 / 2

1,345

+0.4%

1,339

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 3560M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 3560M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 3560M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,339 vs 1,345).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 3560M better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

Yes. Pentium 3560M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 3560M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3560M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 3560M still makes the most sense overall. Pentium 3560M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3560M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium 3560M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 3560M

The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 3560M and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 3560M versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Pentium 3560M. The Pentium 3560M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3560M scores 1,345 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium 3560M.

Feature	Pentium 3560M	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+26%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,345	1,339