Pentium 3560M vs Xeon L5240

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 3560M vs Xeon L5240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 3560M vs Xeon L5240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 3560M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌1180% higher power demand at 512W vs 40W.

Xeon L5240

2008

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 40W instead of 512W, a 472W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,337 vs 1,345).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 3560M better than Xeon L5240?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5240 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium 3560M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 3560M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3560M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 3560M still makes the most sense overall. Pentium 3560M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3560M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium 3560M vs Xeon L5240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 3560M

The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

Xeon L5240

The Xeon L5240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 3560M is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium 3560M scores 1,345 against the Xeon L5240's 1,337 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium 3560M. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium 3560M vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5240.

Feature	Pentium 3560M	Xeon L5240
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	1,345	1,337

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3560M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5240 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.