
Pentium E5700

Phenom II X3 N830
Pentium E5700 vs Phenom II X3 N830 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Pentium E5700 vs Phenom II X3 N830 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Pentium E5700 vs Phenom II X3 N830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Pentium E5700
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X3 N830 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,096 vs 1,107).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Phenom II X3 N830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Phenom II X3 N830
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X3 N830 better than Pentium E5700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium E5700 vs Phenom II X3 N830 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium E5700
The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

Phenom II X3 N830
The Phenom II X3 N830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,107 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Pentium E5700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 N830 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 N830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom II X3 N830 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700. The Pentium E5700 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X3 N830 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E5700 scores 1,096 against the Phenom II X3 N830's 1,107 — a 1% lead for the Phenom II X3 N830.
| Feature | Pentium E5700 | Phenom II X3 N830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+33% | 1.5 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,096 | 1,107+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium E5700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X3 N830 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium E5700 | Phenom II X3 N830 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















