Athlon II Neo K325 vs Pentium E5700

AMD

Athlon II Neo K325

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium E5700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II Neo K325 vs Pentium E5700 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K325 vs Pentium E5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K325 vs Pentium E5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K325

2010

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $15 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E5700

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II Neo K325 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (1,096 vs 1,111).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
    • 6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon II Neo K325 better than Pentium E5700?
    Yes. Athlon II Neo K325 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon II Neo K325 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K325 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon II Neo K325 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K325 comes in $15 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.7% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon II Neo K325 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon II Neo K325 vs Pentium E5700 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon II Neo K325

    The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Pentium E5700

    The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon II Neo K325 and Pentium E5700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 — a 79.1% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700. The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the Geneva (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium E5700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K325 scores 1,111 against the Pentium E5700's 1,096 — a 1.4% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Pentium E5700
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.3 GHz
    3 GHz+131%
    Base Clock
    3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    2 MB (total)+100%
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Geneva (2010)
    Wolfdale (2008−2010)
    PassMark
    1,111+1%
    1,096
    Geekbench 6 Single
    736
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,235
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Pentium E5700
    Socket
    S1
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II Neo K325) / not specified (Pentium E5700). Primary use case: Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Pentium E5700
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Low Power
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon II Neo K325 was priced at $60, while the Pentium E5700 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($60 vs $75), Athlon II Neo K325 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II Neo K325 delivers 18.5 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Pentium E5700 — making the Athlon II Neo K325 the 23.6% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Pentium E5700
    MSRP
    $60-20%
    $75
    Performance per Dollar
    18.5+27%
    14.6
    Release Date
    2010
    2010

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.