E2-1800 vs Pentium E5700

E2-1800 vs Pentium E5700 Performance Spectrum

E2-1800

2 / 2

1,110

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium E5700

2 / 2

1,096

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-1800 vs Pentium E5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-1800 vs Pentium E5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-1800

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E5700

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-1800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,096 vs 1,110).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while E2-1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-1800 better than Pentium E5700?

Yes. E2-1800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-1800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-1800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-1800 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-1800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E5700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-1800 vs Pentium E5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium E5700

The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E2-1800 and Pentium E5700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 — a 55.3% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700. The E2-1800 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium E5700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E2-1800 scores 1,110 against the Pentium E5700's 1,096 — a 1.3% lead for the E2-1800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E2-1800	Pentium E5700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	3 GHz+76%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (total)
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,110+1%	1,096

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-1800 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.