E2-1800 vs Xeon L3406

E2-1800 vs Xeon L3406 Performance Spectrum

E2-1800

2 / 2

1,110

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L3406

1,104

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-1800 vs Xeon L3406 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-1800 vs Xeon L3406: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-1800

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 30W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L3406, which brings 2 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon L3406

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,104 vs 1,110).
❌Launch MSRP is still $189 MSRP, while E2-1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 30W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-1800 better than Xeon L3406?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3406 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while E2-1800 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-1800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-1800 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon L3406 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. E2-1800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon L3406 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon L3406 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-1800 vs Xeon L3406 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon L3406

The Xeon L3406 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-1800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Xeon L3406's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 versus 2.53 GHz on the Xeon L3406 — a 39.2% clock advantage for the Xeon L3406. The E2-1800 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the E2-1800 scores 1,110 against the Xeon L3406's 1,104 — a 0.5% lead for the E2-1800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-1800 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon L3406.

Feature	E2-1800	Xeon L3406
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.53 GHz+49%
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	40 nm	32 nm-20%
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	1,110	1,104