Celeron 1005M vs E2-1800

Celeron 1005M vs E2-1800 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1005M

2 / 2

1,116

+0.5%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,110

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1005M vs E2-1800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1005M vs E2-1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1005M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while E2-1800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while E2-1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2744.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 18W.

E2-1800

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 512W, a 494W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,110 vs 1,116).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1005M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1005M better than E2-1800?

Yes. Celeron 1005M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1005M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1005M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1005M is the better buy right now. Celeron 1005M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1005M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1005M vs E2-1800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1005M and E2-1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 1005M. The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-1800 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the E2-1800's 1,110 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 1005M. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M vs 0 kB on the E2-1800.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	E2-1800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+12%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	22 nm-45%	40 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,116	1,110
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	350	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	607	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-1800 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	E2-1800
Socket	PGA988	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) / not specified (E2-1800). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E2-1800 requires a dedicated GPU.