Celeron 1005M
VS
E2-1800

Celeron 1005M vs E2-1800

Intel

Celeron 1005M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E2-1800

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1005M is positioned at rank 1018 and the E2-1800 is on rank 826, so the E2-1800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1005M

#1006
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2260%
#1007
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2227%
#1008
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2045%
#1009
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2035%
#1010
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2017%
#1012
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1948%
#1013
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1867%
#1014
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1864%
#1015
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1814%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
98%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-1800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16849%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15921%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11560%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3483%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2413%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1382%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1364%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1242%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1242%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1228%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1195%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1178%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1173%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1163%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#826
E2-1800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
100%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
99%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
99%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
99%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
98%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
98%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 1005M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E2-1800 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 1005ME2-1800
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1005ME2-1800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1005M and E2-1800

Intel

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1005M and E2-1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 1005M. The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-1800 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the E2-1800's 1,110 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 1005M. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M vs 0 kB on the E2-1800.

FeatureCeleron 1005ME2-1800
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz+12%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm-45%
40 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,116
1,110
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
607
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-1800 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1005ME2-1800
Socket
PGA988
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) / not specified (E2-1800). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E2-1800 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1005ME2-1800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d