Celeron N3350 vs Pentium E5700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3350 vs Pentium E5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3350 vs Pentium E5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Pentium E5700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Pentium E5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N3350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,096 vs 1,112).
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3350 better than Pentium E5700?

Yes. Celeron N3350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3350 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N3350 comes in 42.7% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E5700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 40.6% better value on paper (14.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3350 vs Pentium E5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Pentium E5700

The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3350 and Pentium E5700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Pentium E5700's 1,096 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron N3350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Pentium E5700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3 GHz+173%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,112+1%	1,096
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Pentium E5700
Socket	FCBGA1296	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) / not specified (Pentium E5700). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium E5700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Pentium E5700
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 500	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Entry Level Laptop/NUC	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N3350 was priced at $107, while the Pentium E5700 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($107 vs $75), Pentium E5700 was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Pentium E5700 — making the Pentium E5700 the 33.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Pentium E5700
MSRP	$107	$75-30%
Performance per Dollar	10.4	14.6+40%
Release Date	2016	2010

Search Celeron N3350 on Amazon

Search Pentium E5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.