Pentium G2140
VS
Celeron N2807

Pentium G2140 vs Celeron N2807

Intel

Pentium G2140

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WW2013
VS
Intel

Celeron N2807

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G2140 is positioned at rank 775 and the Celeron N2807 is on rank 51, so the Celeron N2807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G2140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14900%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14079%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10223%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3080%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2439%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2134%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1222%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1206%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1098%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1098%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1086%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1057%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1042%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1038%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1028%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
100%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
100%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
100%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
99%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
99%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
98%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
98%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
98%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
98%
#790
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2807

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#39
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
210%
#40
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
207%
#41
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
190%
#42
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
189%
#43
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
188%
#45
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
181%
#46
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
174%
#47
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
173%
#48
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
169%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G2140 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N2807 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium G2140Celeron N2807
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron N2807 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 37% cheaper ($60 vs $95) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium G2140Celeron N2807
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+58%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G2140 and Celeron N2807

Intel

Pentium G2140

The Pentium G2140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G2140 and Celeron N2807 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron N2807 is built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium G2140 scores 2,092 against the Celeron N2807's 2,093 — a 0% lead for the Celeron N2807. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 550 vs 180, a 101.4% lead for the Pentium G2140 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 920 vs 320 (96.8% advantage for the Pentium G2140). L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G2140 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2807.

FeaturePentium G2140Celeron N2807
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.16 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+109%
1.58 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,092
2,093
Geekbench 6 Single
550+206%
180
Geekbench 6 Multi
920+188%
320
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G2140 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2807 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Pentium G2140 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Pentium G2140) vs 1 (Celeron N2807). PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium G2140) vs 4 (Celeron N2807) — the Pentium G2140 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75 (Pentium G2140) and SoC (Celeron N2807).

FeaturePentium G2140Celeron N2807
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+700%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Pentium G2140) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G2140 targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron N2807 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.

FeaturePentium G2140Celeron N2807
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Netbook
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium G2140 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron N2807 debuted at $107. At current prices ($95 vs $60), the Celeron N2807 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G2140 delivers 22.0 pts/$ vs 34.9 pts/$ for the Celeron N2807 — making the Celeron N2807 the 45.2% better value option.

FeaturePentium G2140Celeron N2807
MSRP
$100-7%
$107
Avg Price (30d)
$95
$60-37%
Performance per Dollar
22.0
34.9+59%
Release Date
2013
2014