Pentium J2900 vs Pentium N3700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium J2900 vs Pentium N3700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium J2900 vs Pentium N3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium J2900

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $94 MSRP, while Pentium N3700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium N3700

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,248 vs 1,254).
❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium J2900 better than Pentium N3700?

Yes. Pentium J2900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium J2900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 33 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium J2900 is the better buy right now. Pentium J2900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $94 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium J2900 vs Pentium N3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium J2900

The Pentium J2900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $94.

Pentium N3700

The Pentium N3700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Pentium J2900 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium N3700 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Pentium J2900 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium J2900 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium N3700 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium J2900 scores 1,254 against the Pentium N3700's 1,248 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium J2900. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2900 vs 0 kB on the Pentium N3700.

Feature	Pentium J2900	Pentium N3700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.66 GHz+11%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.41 GHz+51%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,254	1,248