Pentium M 1.40 vs Pentium M 1.50

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 1.40 vs Pentium M 1.50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 1.40 vs Pentium M 1.50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 1.40

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 375).

Pentium M 1.50

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.50 better than Pentium M 1.40?

Yes. Pentium M 1.50 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 8.7% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 1.50 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 7.1% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.50 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 1.50 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 8.7% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 1.50 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 1.40 vs Pentium M 1.50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 1.40

The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 1.50

The Pentium M 1.50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 1.40 and Pentium M 1.50 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 1.50 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Pentium M 1.50. Both are built on the Banias (2003) architecture using a 130 nm process. In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.40 scores 345 against the Pentium M 1.50's 375 — a 8.3% lead for the Pentium M 1.50. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 1.40	Pentium M 1.50
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.5 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Banias (2003)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	345	375+9%