Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Pentium M 1.40 vs Sempron 3000+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Pentium M 1.40

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Sempron 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Pentium M 1.40 vs Sempron 3000+ Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 1.40
1 / 1
345
0.0%
brand logoAtom Z510
brand logoPentium III 1400S
brand logoAtom N270
brand logoCeleron 2.20
brand logoCore Ultra 7 268V
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
Sempron 3000+
1 / 1
350
+1.4%
brand logoAthlon XP 1500+
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5655G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 1.40 vs Sempron 3000+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Pentium M 1.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Pentium M 1.40 vs Sempron 3000+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 1.40

2003

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 24W instead of 62W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 350).

Sempron 3000+

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌158.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 24W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 3000+ better than Pentium M 1.40?
    Yes. Sempron 3000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.4% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3000+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 28.6% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 3000+ still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 3000+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% higher PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3000+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium M 1.40 vs Sempron 3000+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium M 1.40

    The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3000+

    The Sempron 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 350 points. Launch price was $50.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium M 1.40 and Sempron 3000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3000+ — a 25% clock advantage for the Sempron 3000+. The Pentium M 1.40 uses the Banias (2003) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3000+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 1.40 scores 345 against the Sempron 3000+'s 350 — a 1.4% lead for the Sempron 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium M 1.40Sempron 3000+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.4 GHz
    1.8 GHz+29%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB+700%
    128 kB
    Process
    130 nm
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Banias (2003)
    Palermo (2001−2005)
    PassMark
    345
    350+1%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium M 1.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3000+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium M 1.40Sempron 3000+
    Socket
    PGA478
    939
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%