Pentium M 735
VS
A6-5400B

Pentium M 735 vs A6-5400B

Intel

Pentium M 735

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2004
VS
AMD

A6-5400B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 735 is positioned at rank 1207 and the A6-5400B is on rank 699, so the A6-5400B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 735

#1195
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5915%
#1196
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5829%
#1197
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5351%
#1198
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5327%
#1199
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5278%
#1201
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5097%
#1202
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4887%
#1203
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4879%
#1204
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4748%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
98%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
96%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
94%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
93%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
92%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
92%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
90%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
89%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
87%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-5400B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12765%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12061%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8758%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2090%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1828%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1047%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1033%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
941%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
941%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
930%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
905%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
893%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
889%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
881%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#699
A6-5400B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
100%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-5400B (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium M 735A6-5400B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 735 (2004) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium M 735A6-5400B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 735 and A6-5400B

Intel

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A6-5400B

The A6-5400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,465 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Pentium M 735 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the A6-5400B offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-5400B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 versus 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400B — a 76.4% clock advantage for the A6-5400B (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Pentium M 735 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the A6-5400B uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 735 scores 1,459 against the A6-5400B's 1,465 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-5400B. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 735A6-5400B
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.8 GHz+124%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+112%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
90 nm
32 nm-64%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,459
1,465
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 735 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-5400B uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 versus DDR3-1866 on the A6-5400B — the A6-5400B supports -203.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5400B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Pentium M 735) vs 2 (A6-5400B). PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium M 735) vs 16 (A6-5400B) — the A6-5400B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium M 735A6-5400B
Socket
PGA478
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
32 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Pentium M 735) vs AMD-V (A6-5400B). The A6-5400B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7540D), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy, A6-5400B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-5400B rivals Pentium G2020.

FeaturePentium M 735A6-5400B
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7540D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile Legacy
Business Desktop