Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X4 9450e

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X4 9450e Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 735

1 / 1

1,459

+0.3%

1,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X4 9450e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X4 9450e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 3.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Draws 21W instead of 65W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom X4 9450e

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,459).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
❌209.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 21W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 735 better than Phenom X4 9450e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom X4 9450e is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 735 is the better buy right now. Pentium M 735 comes in $156 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom X4 9450e is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.5% better value on MSRP (5.0 vs 3.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom X4 9450e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X4 9450e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom X4 9450e

The Phenom X4 9450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 735 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom X4 9450e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9450e has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X4 9450e — a 21.1% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9450e. The Pentium M 735 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 735 scores 1,459 against the Phenom X4 9450e's 1,455 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 735 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9450e.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X4 9450e
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	90 nm	65 nm-28%
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,459	1,455

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 735 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X4 9450e
Socket	PGA478	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-333	—
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium M 735) / not specified (Phenom X4 9450e). Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X4 9450e
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Mobile Legacy	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium M 735 was priced at $294, while the Phenom X4 9450e came in at $450. On launch pricing ($294 vs $450), Pentium M 735 was $156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium M 735 delivers 5.0 pts/$ vs 3.2 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9450e — making the Pentium M 735 the 42.2% better value option.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP	$294-35%	$450
Performance per Dollar	5.0+56%	3.2
Release Date	2004	2008

Search Pentium M 735 on Amazon

Search Phenom X4 9450e on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.