C-60 vs Pentium M 735

CPU

GPU

C-60

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Pentium M 735

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2004

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

C-60 vs Pentium M 735 Performance Spectrum

C-60

2 / 2

1,483

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 735

1 / 1

1,459

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-60 vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-60 vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-60

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $244 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 497.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.7 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 9W instead of 21W, a 12W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than C-60 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,459 vs 1,483).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 21W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while C-60 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is C-60 better than Pentium M 735?

Yes. C-60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, C-60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, C-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

C-60 is the better buy right now. C-60 comes in $244 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 497.7% better value on MSRP (29.7 vs 5.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-60 vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-60

The C-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,483 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The C-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the C-60 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-60 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Pentium M 735 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The C-60 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the C-60 scores 1,483 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 1.6% lead for the C-60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	C-60	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	1.7 GHz+28%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.7 GHz+70%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	40 nm-56%	90 nm
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,483+2%	1,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-60 versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the C-60 supports -420.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The C-60 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (C-60) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the C-60 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	C-60	Pentium M 735
Socket	FT1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-60) / None (Pentium M 735). The C-60 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6290), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.

Feature	C-60	Pentium M 735
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6290	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	None
Target Use	—	Mobile Legacy

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the C-60 was priced at $50, while the Pentium M 735 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($50 vs $294), C-60 was $244 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the C-60 delivers 29.7 pts/$ vs 5.0 pts/$ for the Pentium M 735 — making the C-60 the 142.7% better value option.

Feature	C-60	Pentium M 735
MSRP	$50-83%	$294
Performance per Dollar	29.7+494%	5.0
Release Date	2011	2004

Search C-60 on Amazon

Search Pentium M 735 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.