Pentium M 735 vs Turion II P560

Intel

Pentium M 735

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion II P560

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Pentium M 735 vs Turion II P560 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 735 vs Turion II P560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 735 vs Turion II P560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Turion II P560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 950% higher power demand at 21W vs 2W.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 21W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,459).

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II P560 better than Pentium M 735?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II P560 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Turion II P560 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion II P560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium M 735 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2004 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion II P560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium M 735 vs Turion II P560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium M 735 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II P560 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II P560 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II P560 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Turion II P560. The Pentium M 735 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion II P560 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 735 scores 1,459 against the Turion II P560's 1,455 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium M 735.

FeaturePentium M 735Turion II P560
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
2.5 GHz+47%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Process
90 nm
45 nm-50%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,459
1,455
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 735 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II P560 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 735Turion II P560
Socket
PGA478
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium M 735) / not specified (Turion II P560). Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.

FeaturePentium M 735Turion II P560
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Mobile Legacy