
Pentium P6000

Xeon E5420
Pentium P6000 vs Xeon E5420 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Pentium P6000 vs Xeon E5420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Pentium P6000 vs Xeon E5420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Pentium P6000
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $7,064 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4725.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 0.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5420 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5420, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5420
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,044 vs 2,051).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium P6000 better than Xeon E5420?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium P6000 vs Xeon E5420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium P6000
The Pentium P6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.88 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5420
The Xeon E5420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,044 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
The Pentium P6000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5420 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5420 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.88 GHz on the Pentium P6000 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5420 — a 28.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5420 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Pentium P6000 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5420 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6000 scores 2,051 against the Xeon E5420's 2,044 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium P6000. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6000 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5420.
| Feature | Pentium P6000 | Xeon E5420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.88 GHz | 2.5 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | 2.5 GHz+34% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+4167% | 6 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,051 | 2,044 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 314 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 881 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium P6000 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5420 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium P6000 | Xeon E5420 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 32 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium P6000) / Yes (Xeon E5420).
| Feature | Pentium P6000 | Xeon E5420 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Pentium P6000 was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5420 came in at $7214. On launch pricing ($150 vs $7214), Pentium P6000 was $7064 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium P6000 delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 0.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5420 — making the Pentium P6000 the 191.9% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium P6000 | Xeon E5420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-98% | $7214 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.7+4467% | 0.3 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














