Celeron M 585 vs Pentium P6000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 585 vs Pentium P6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 585 vs Pentium P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 585

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium P6000

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron M 585 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,062).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron M 585 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 585 better than Pentium P6000?

Yes. Celeron M 585 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 585 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 585 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 585 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron M 585 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6000 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium P6000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 585 vs Pentium P6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium P6000

The Pentium P6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.88 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium P6000 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium P6000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 1.88 GHz on the Pentium P6000 — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Celeron M 585. The Celeron M 585 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium P6000 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Pentium P6000's 2,051 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 585.

Feature	Celeron M 585	Pentium P6000
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz+15%	1.88 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,062	2,051

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 585 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium P6000 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.