
Pentium G3258

Pentium P6000
Pentium G3258 vs Pentium P6000 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Pentium G3258 vs Pentium P6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Pentium G3258 vs Pentium P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Pentium G3258
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Pentium P6000 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
Pentium P6000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G3258 across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,063).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G3258 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3258 better than Pentium P6000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G3258 vs Pentium P6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G3258
The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Pentium P6000
The Pentium P6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.88 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium G3258 and Pentium P6000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 versus 1.88 GHz on the Pentium P6000 — a 52% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Pentium G3258 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium P6000 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3258 scores 2,063 against the Pentium P6000's 2,051 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G3258. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium G3258 | Pentium P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+70% | 1.88 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+72% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,063 | 2,051 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium G3258 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6000 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium G3258 | Pentium P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Pentium G3258) / not specified (Pentium P6000). The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Pentium P6000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Pentium G3258 | Pentium P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Pentium G3258 was priced at $75, while the Pentium P6000 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($75 vs $150), Pentium G3258 was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G3258 delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Pentium P6000 — making the Pentium G3258 the 67.2% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium G3258 | Pentium P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-50% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5+101% | 13.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














