Pentium P6200
VS
Athlon II X4 645

Pentium P6200 vs Athlon II X4 645

Intel

Pentium P6200

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 645

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium P6200 is positioned at rank 557 and the Athlon II X4 645 is on rank 819, so the Pentium P6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6200

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
98%
#545
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
735%
#546
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
725%
#547
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
665%
#548
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
662%
#549
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
656%
#551
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
634%
#552
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
608%
#553
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
607%
#554
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
590%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16537%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15625%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11345%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3418%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2707%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2368%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1356%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1339%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1219%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1219%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1205%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1173%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1156%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1152%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1141%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
96%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
99%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
99%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X4 645 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium P6200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium P6200Athlon II X4 645
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X4 645 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 20% cheaper ($20 vs $25) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium P6200Athlon II X4 645
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+24%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($20)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium P6200 and Athlon II X4 645

Intel

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

AMD

Athlon II X4 645

The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Pentium P6200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 645 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 645 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Pentium P6200 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6200 scores 2,394 against the Athlon II X4 645's 2,375 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium P6200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 399, a 66.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 645 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 400 vs 1,374 (109.8% advantage for the Athlon II X4 645). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645.

FeaturePentium P6200Athlon II X4 645
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
0.13 GHz
3.1 GHz+2285%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
3.1 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,394
2,375
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,374
Geekbench 6 Single
200
399+100%
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
1,374+244%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6200 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 645 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57 (Pentium P6200) and AMD 700 Series,AMD 800 Series,AMD 900 Series (Athlon II X4 645).

FeaturePentium P6200Athlon II X4 645
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: None (Pentium P6200) vs Yes (Athlon II X4 645). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II X4 645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop, Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop.

FeaturePentium P6200Athlon II X4 645
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
Yes
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium P6200 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 645 debuted at $126. At current prices ($25 vs $20), the Athlon II X4 645 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium P6200 delivers 95.8 pts/$ vs 118.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 645 — making the Athlon II X4 645 the 21.4% better value option.

FeaturePentium P6200Athlon II X4 645
MSRP
$60-52%
$126
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$20-20%
Performance per Dollar
95.8
118.8+24%
Release Date
2010
2010