Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5440

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium P6200

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1063.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.9 vs 3.4 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5440 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5440, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5440

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,367 vs 2,394).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 39.9 PassMark/$ ($690 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium P6200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium P6200 better than Xeon E5440?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium P6200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium P6200 is the better buy right now. Pentium P6200 comes in $630 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $690 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5440 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1063.1% better value on MSRP (39.9 vs 3.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium P6200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium P6200 vs Xeon E5440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Xeon E5440

The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium P6200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 versus 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 — a 145.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5440 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Pentium P6200 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5440 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6200 scores 2,394 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Xeon E5440
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	0.83 GHz+538%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.83 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,394+1%	2,367
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6200 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Xeon E5440
Socket	PGA988	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium P6200) / not specified (Xeon E5440). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Xeon E5440
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium P6200 was priced at $60, while the Xeon E5440 came in at $690. On launch pricing ($60 vs $690), Pentium P6200 was $630 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium P6200 delivers 39.9 pts/$ vs 3.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 — making the Pentium P6200 the 168.3% better value option.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Xeon E5440
MSRP	$60-91%	$690
Performance per Dollar	39.9+1074%	3.4
Release Date	2010	2007

Search Pentium P6200 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.