Pentium P6200 vs Phenom II X4 840T

Pentium P6200 vs Phenom II X4 840T Performance Spectrum

Pentium P6200

2 / 2

2,394

+1.1%

Processor N50

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,367

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium P6200 vs Phenom II X4 840T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium P6200 vs Phenom II X4 840T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium P6200

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Phenom II X4 840T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 840T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 840T

2010

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,367 vs 2,394).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium P6200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium P6200 better than Phenom II X4 840T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X4 840T is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6200 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 840T also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium P6200 is the better buy right now. Pentium P6200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 840T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom II X4 840T is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Pentium P6200 vs Phenom II X4 840T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Phenom II X4 840T

The Phenom II X4 840T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Zosma (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium P6200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 840T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 840T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 840T — a 184.4% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 840T (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Pentium P6200 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X4 840T uses Zosma (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6200 scores 2,394 against the Phenom II X4 840T's 2,367 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 840T.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Phenom II X4 840T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	3.2 GHz+2362%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.9 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Zosma (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,394+1%	2,367
Geekbench 6 Single	200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6200 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 840T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium P6200	Phenom II X4 840T
Socket	PGA988	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium P6200) / not specified (Phenom II X4 840T). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X4 840T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.