Pentium P6200
VS
Core m3-7Y30

Pentium P6200 vs Core m3-7Y30

Intel

Pentium P6200

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core m3-7Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium P6200 is positioned at rank 557 and the Core m3-7Y30 is on rank 1116, so the Pentium P6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6200

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
98%
#545
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
735%
#546
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
725%
#547
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
665%
#548
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
662%
#549
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
656%
#551
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
634%
#552
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
608%
#553
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
607%
#554
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
590%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y30

#1104
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3412%
#1105
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3362%
#1106
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3086%
#1107
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3072%
#1108
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3044%
#1110
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2940%
#1111
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2819%
#1112
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2814%
#1113
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2738%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
99%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
96%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
95%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
95%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core m3-7Y30 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium P6200Core m3-7Y30
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium P6200 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium P6200Core m3-7Y30
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1013%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium P6200 and Core m3-7Y30

Intel

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Pentium P6200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-7Y30's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 — a 181% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y30 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Pentium P6200 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6200 scores 2,394 against the Core m3-7Y30's 2,418 — a 1% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 768, a 117.4% lead for the Core m3-7Y30 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 400 vs 1,481 (114.9% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200 vs 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30.

FeaturePentium P6200Core m3-7Y30
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
0.13 GHz
2.6 GHz+1900%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz+113%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,394
2,418+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
645
Geekbench 6 Single
200
768+284%
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
1,481+270%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6200 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Core m3-7Y30 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium P6200) vs 10 (Core m3-7Y30) — the Pentium P6200 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57 (Pentium P6200) and Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30).

FeaturePentium P6200Core m3-7Y30
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+60%
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Pentium P6200) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Pentium P6200) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop, Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable.

FeaturePentium P6200Core m3-7Y30
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Ultra-portable
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium P6200 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core m3-7Y30 debuted at $281. At current prices ($25 vs $281), the Pentium P6200 is $256 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium P6200 delivers 95.8 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y30 — making the Pentium P6200 the 167% better value option.

FeaturePentium P6200Core m3-7Y30
MSRP
$60-79%
$281
Avg Price (30d)
$25-91%
$281
Performance per Dollar
95.8+1014%
8.6
Release Date
2010
2016