Pentium P6200
VS
Core i7-3517UE

Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-3517UE

Intel

Pentium P6200

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i7-3517UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium P6200 is positioned at rank 557 and the Core i7-3517UE is on rank 1154, so the Pentium P6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6200

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
98%
#545
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
735%
#546
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
725%
#547
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
665%
#548
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
662%
#549
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
656%
#551
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
634%
#552
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
608%
#553
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
607%
#554
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
590%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3517UE

#1142
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4064%
#1143
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4004%
#1144
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3676%
#1145
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3659%
#1146
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3626%
#1148
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3501%
#1149
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3357%
#1150
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3352%
#1151
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3262%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
100%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
100%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
99%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
95%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3517UE leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium P6200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium P6200Core i7-3517UE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium P6200 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 29% cheaper ($25 vs $35) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium P6200Core i7-3517UE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+41%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium P6200 and Core i7-3517UE

Intel

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Intel

Core i7-3517UE

The Core i7-3517UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,384 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium P6200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3517UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-3517UE — a 182.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3517UE (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Pentium P6200 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-3517UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6200 scores 2,394 against the Core i7-3517UE's 2,384 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517UE.

FeaturePentium P6200Core i7-3517UE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
0.13 GHz
2.8 GHz+2054%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz+25%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,394
2,384
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6200 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-3517UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium P6200Core i7-3517UE
Socket
PGA988
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium P6200) / not specified (Core i7-3517UE). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core i7-3517UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeaturePentium P6200Core i7-3517UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium P6200 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core i7-3517UE debuted at $330. At current prices ($25 vs $35), the Pentium P6200 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium P6200 delivers 95.8 pts/$ vs 68.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-3517UE — making the Pentium P6200 the 33.7% better value option.

FeaturePentium P6200Core i7-3517UE
MSRP
$60-82%
$330
Avg Price (30d)
$25-29%
$35
Performance per Dollar
95.8+41%
68.1
Release Date
2010
2012