Phenom II X4 900e
VS
Core 2 Duo T5750

Phenom II X4 900e vs Core 2 Duo T5750

AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 900e is positioned at rank 373 and the Core 2 Duo T5750 is on rank 28, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 900e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5415%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3715%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1119%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
886%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
775%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
444%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
399%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
399%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
395%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
384%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
379%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
377%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
374%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
100%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
98%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
97%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
97%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
96%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
96%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
95%
#373
Phenom II X4 900e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
97%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750

#16
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
169%
#17
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#18
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
153%
#19
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
152%
#20
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
151%
#22
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#23
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#24
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#25
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
136%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
99%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
98%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X4 900e leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T5750 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X4 900eCore 2 Duo T5750
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X4 900eCore 2 Duo T5750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 900e and Core 2 Duo T5750

AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

The Phenom II X4 900e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X4 900e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X4 900e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 900e versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 900e (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Phenom II X4 900e uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 900e scores 1,727 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 900e vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.

FeaturePhenom II X4 900eCore 2 Duo T5750
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,727
1,738
Geekbench 6 Single
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
680
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 900e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 900eCore 2 Duo T5750
Socket
AM3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 900e) / None (Core 2 Duo T5750). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeaturePhenom II X4 900eCore 2 Duo T5750
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop