Phenom II X4 920
VS
Xeon E5462

Phenom II X4 920 vs Xeon E5462

AMD

Phenom II X4 920

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Xeon E5462

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 920 is positioned at rank 289 and the Xeon E5462 is on rank 955, so the Phenom II X4 920 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 920

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4247%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4013%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2914%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
878%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
695%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
608%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
348%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
344%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
313%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
313%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
310%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
301%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
297%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
296%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
293%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
100%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
100%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
100%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
98%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
98%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
97%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
97%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
97%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
96%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
96%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
95%
#289
Phenom II X4 920
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5462

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
32121%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6065%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5388%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4163%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
99%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
97%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
95%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
94%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
93%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
93%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
100%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
98%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
97%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
94%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
94%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
94%
#969
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
90%
#970
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($45) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5462 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightPhenom II X4 920Xeon E5462
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 920 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($45 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightPhenom II X4 920Xeon E5462
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 920 and Xeon E5462

AMD

Phenom II X4 920

The Phenom II X4 920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Xeon E5462

The Xeon E5462 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $797.

Processing Power

Both the Phenom II X4 920 and Xeon E5462 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 920 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5462 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Phenom II X4 920 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5462 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 920 scores 2,202 against the Xeon E5462's 2,213 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5462. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 920 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5462.

FeaturePhenom II X4 920Xeon E5462
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
6 MB (total)+1100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,202
2,213
Geekbench 6 Single
363
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,239
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 920 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5462 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 920Xeon E5462
Socket
AM3
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 920) / VT-x (Xeon E5462). Primary use case: Xeon E5462 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon E5462 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

FeaturePhenom II X4 920Xeon E5462
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Server