Pentium G4400TE vs Phenom II X4 920

Pentium G4400TE vs Phenom II X4 920 Performance Spectrum

Pentium G4400TE

2 / 2

2,190

0.0%

2,202

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G4400TE vs Phenom II X4 920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G4400TE vs Phenom II X4 920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G4400TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Phenom II X4 920 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,190 vs 2,202).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 920 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 920

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4400TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 920 better than Pentium G4400TE?

Yes. Phenom II X4 920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 31 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 920 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Phenom II X4 920 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4400TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4400TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium G4400TE vs Phenom II X4 920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

Phenom II X4 920

The Phenom II X4 920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $90.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G4400TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 920 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 920 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 920. The Pentium G4400TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G4400TE scores 2,190 against the Phenom II X4 920's 2,202 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X4 920. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 920.

Feature	Pentium G4400TE	Phenom II X4 920
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,190	2,202

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G4400TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G4400TE	Phenom II X4 920
Socket	LGA1151	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Pentium G4400TE) / not specified (Phenom II X4 920). The Pentium G4400TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Phenom II X4 920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop.