
Core 2 Duo E8700

Pentium G4400TE
Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pentium G4400TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E8700
2009Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $44 less on MSRP ($256 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β Delivers 18.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($256 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Pentium G4400TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G4400TE
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Core 2 Duo E8700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8700 across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,190 vs 2,212).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E8700 better than Pentium G4400TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8700
The Core 2 Duo E8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008β2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,212 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium G4400TE
The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015β2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E8700 and Pentium G4400TE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE β a 37.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8700. The Core 2 Duo E8700 uses the Wolfdale (2008β2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015β2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8700 scores 2,212 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 β a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8700.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8700 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | β | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+1100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008β2010) | Skylake (2015β2016) |
| PassMark | 2,212+1% | 2,190 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8700 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8700) / VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). The Pentium G4400TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8700 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8700 was priced at $256, while the Pentium G4400TE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($256 vs $300), Core 2 Duo E8700 was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8700 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400TE β making the Core 2 Duo E8700 the 16.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8700 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $256-15% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+18% | 7.3 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














