
Celeron G4900T

Core 2 Duo E8700
Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo E8700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo E8700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo E8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4900T
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 517.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.3 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 2 Duo E8700
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,212 vs 2,239).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 53.3 PassMark/$ ($256 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4900T better than Core 2 Duo E8700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo E8700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T
The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Core 2 Duo E8700
The Core 2 Duo E8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,212 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G4900T and Core 2 Duo E8700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8700 — a 18.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Core 2 Duo E8700's 2,212 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron G4900T.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Core 2 Duo E8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+4167% | 6 MB (total) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,239+1% | 2,212 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 623 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,040 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Core 2 Duo E8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8700). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Core 2 Duo E8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G4900T was priced at $42, while the Core 2 Duo E8700 came in at $256. On launch pricing ($42 vs $256), Celeron G4900T was $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900T delivers 53.3 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8700 — making the Celeron G4900T the 144.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Core 2 Duo E8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-84% | $256 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.3+520% | 8.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














