Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Core i7-3555LE

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-3555LE

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Core i7-3555LE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Core i7-3555LE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Core i7-3555LE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E8700

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $44 less on MSRP ($256 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 15.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($256 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,212 vs 2,238).
  • 160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Core i7-3555LE

2012

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3555LE better than Core 2 Duo E8700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E8700 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3555LE pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3555LE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-3555LE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-3555LE comes in 17.2% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $256 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo E8700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 15.8% better value on paper (8.6 vs 7.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3555LE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Core i7-3555LE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8700

The Core 2 Duo E8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,212 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i7-3555LE

The Core i7-3555LE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,238 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E8700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3555LE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8700 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3555LE — a 9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8700 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-3555LE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8700 scores 2,212 against the Core i7-3555LE's 2,238 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3555LE.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8700Core i7-3555LE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+9%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+40%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+2300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,212
2,238+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-3555LE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8700Core i7-3555LE
Socket
LGA775
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8700 was priced at $256, while the Core i7-3555LE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($256 vs $300), Core 2 Duo E8700 was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8700 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-3555LE — making the Core 2 Duo E8700 the 14.7% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8700Core i7-3555LE
MSRP
$256-15%
$300
Performance per Dollar
8.6+15%
7.5
Release Date
2009
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.