Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pro A8-8600B

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pro A8-8600B Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E8700

2 / 2

2,212

+0.4%

2,203

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pro A8-8600B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pro A8-8600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E8700

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($256 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Pro A8-8600B

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $106 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,203 vs 2,212).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E8700 better than Pro A8-8600B?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E8700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E8700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E8700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E8700 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core 2 Duo E8700 comes in 70.7% more expensive on MSRP at $256 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pro A8-8600B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A8-8600B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo E8700 vs Pro A8-8600B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8700

The Core 2 Duo E8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,212 points. Launch price was $249.

Pro A8-8600B

The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E8700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pro A8-8600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8700 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8700 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A8-8600B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8700 scores 2,212 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8700.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8700	Pro A8-8600B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+119%	1.6 GHz
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+200%	2048 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,212	2,203

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8700	Pro A8-8600B
Socket	LGA775	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8700 was priced at $256, while the Pro A8-8600B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($256 vs $150), Pro A8-8600B was $106 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8700 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Pro A8-8600B the 51.8% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8700	Pro A8-8600B
MSRP	$256	$150-41%
Performance per Dollar	8.6	14.7+71%
Release Date	2009	2015

Search Core 2 Duo E8700 on Amazon

Search Pro A8-8600B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.