PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,176 vs 2,190).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4400TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium G4400TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Core 2 Quad Q9505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4400TE better than Core 2 Quad Q9505?

Yes. Pentium G4400TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G4400TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G4400TE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G4400TE comes in 40.8% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q9505 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 39.9% better value on paper (10.2 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4400TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 97.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400TE. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 scores 2,176 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9505	Pentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.83 GHz	2.4 GHz+189%
Base Clock	2.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache+100%	3 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+1100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,176	2,190

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Pentium G4400TE supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) vs 16 (Pentium G4400TE) — the Pentium G4400TE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9505	Pentium G4400TE
Socket	LGA775	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-2133+60%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium G4400TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop, Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9505	Pentium G4400TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 510
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 was priced at $213, while the Pentium G4400TE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($213 vs $300), Core 2 Quad Q9505 was $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9505 delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400TE — making the Core 2 Quad Q9505 the 33.3% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9505	Pentium G4400TE
MSRP	$213-29%	$300
Performance per Dollar	10.2+40%	7.3
Release Date	2009	2015

Search Core 2 Quad Q9505 on Amazon

Search Pentium G4400TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.